arXiv (All)
open access
ProMediConv: Benchmarking Proactive Conversational Agents in Legal Dispute Mediation
Dispute mediation is essential for maintaining social harmony and resilience, yet developing skilled mediators is costly and time-consuming. Existing LLM-based mediation research remains limited by unrealistic task formulations, low-fidelity datasets, and coarse evaluation metrics that obscure turn-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#798369
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#796956
- LLMs as a Jury: Cross-Model Consensus Can Outperform Process Reward Models for LLM Reasoning#615092
- LLMs as a Jury: Cross-Model Consensus Can Outperform Process Reward Models for LLM Reasoning#614125
- Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking#1013066
Record · ID 998657
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive