arXiv (All)
open access
Can We Trust LLM Judges: A Study of Capability-Dependent Biases and Multi-Judge Ensemble for Bias Calibration
LLMs are increasingly used as automated judges for model training and evaluation, yet individual judges exhibit systematic biases that undermine reliability. Much of prior work has studied biases in pairwise LLM-as-a-judge settings; in this paper, we focus on absolute scoring tasks, which mirror mor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- OSCAR: Order-aware Scoring and Calibration for AI Rankings#1050313
- Diagnosing LLM Judge Reliability: Conformal Prediction Sets and Transitivity Violations#18994
- Accounting for Bias Enables Sustainable LLM Evaluation#1105742
- Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Data#684488
- Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Data#682713
Record · ID 999983
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive