Paperspublic full text
Zenodo (CERN)
zenodo · Papers · License: Open Access
6,436Documents
749Full text
2026-09-07Last indexed
Recent documents from this source
- L'AUTONOMIE DE L'ÉTUDIANT À L'ÈRE DU NUMÉRIQUE : STRATÉGIES DE RÉGULATION DE L'ATTENTION EN COURS MAGISTRAL À L'UNIVERSITÉ D'ABOMEY-CALAVI (UAC)#343113
- The Inter-State Application to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg – Potential Revival#343112
- قاعدة مراعاة العرف عند المالكية وأثرها في نوازل المسلمين بالغرب#343111
- Land Reform and Welfare in Vietnam: Why Gender of the Land-Rights Holder Matters#343110
- Lanchester Combat Model with One-Sided Information#343109
- 친족 성폭력의 실태, 사법적 처벌 및 피해자 보호 체계에 관한 종단적 연구#343108
- ЗАХИСТ ПРАВ ПРИВАТНИХ ОСІБ ЧЕРЕЗ РЕЄСТР ЗБИТКІВ ДЛЯ УКРАЇНИ#343107
- RECKLESS DRIVING, TRANSPORT CRIME, AND PASSENGERS' SAFETY PERCEPTION IN COMMERCIAL TRICYCLE OPERATIONS IN OBIO/AKPOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, RIVERS STATE, NIGERIA#343106
- IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENT PERFORMANCEABSTRACT The rapid digitalization of education, accelerated by the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the COVID-19 pandemic, has fundamentally transformed instructional delivery. Despite significant global investment in Educational Technology (EdTech), the correlation between digital tools and student academic achievement remains a subject of intense debate. This study synthesizes empirical evidence from 2019 to 2026 to evaluate the impact of various technological interventions, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Gamification, and Mobile Learning, on student performance in educational management contexts. A systematic review of over 40 distinct studies was conducted, utilizing frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the SAMR model to analyze efficacy across diverse subject domains and institutional settings. Results indicate a small to medium positive effect size (d ≈ 0.35), heavily contingent on implementation quality rather than hardware presence. AI and VR show strong potential in STEM and personalized learning, while mobile learning effectively supports formative assessment but poses distraction risks. Crucially, teacher digital competence and student self-regulation were identified as primary mediating variables. The study concludes that technology is an amplifier of pedagogy, not a substitute. It recommends that educational managers prioritize "humanware", teacher training and pedagogical design, over mere hardware acquisition to bridge digital divides and maximize academic return on investment. ABSTRACT The rapid digitalization of education, accelerated by the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the COVID-19 pandemic, has fundamentally transformed instructional delivery. Despite significant global investment in Educational Technology (EdTech), the correlation between digital tools and student academic achievement remains a subject of intense debate. This study synthesizes empirical evidence from 2019 to 2026 to evaluate the impact of various technological interventions, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Gamification, and Mobile Learning, on student performance in educational management contexts. A systematic review of over 40 distinct studies was conducted, utilizing frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the SAMR model to analyze efficacy across diverse subject domains and institutional settings. Results indicate a small to medium positive effect size (d ≈ 0.35), heavily contingent on implementation quality rather than hardware presence. AI and VR show strong potential in STEM and personalized learning, while mobile learning effectively supports formative assessment but poses distraction risks. Crucially, teacher digital competence and student self-regulation were identified as primary mediating variables. The study concludes that technology is an amplifier of pedagogy, not a substitute. It recommends that educational managers prioritize "humanware", teacher training and pedagogical design, over mere hardware acquisition to bridge digital divides and maximize academic return on investment.#343105
- FIGURE 1 in The Chinese species of the genus Ascogaster Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Cheloninae)#343104
- FIGURE 26 in The Chinese species of the genus Ascogaster Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Cheloninae)#343103
- FIGURE 51 in The Chinese species of the genus Ascogaster Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Cheloninae)#343102
- Ascogaster lini Tang and Marsh 1994#343101
- What is cultural in cultural commons?#343100
- ASTRA v2: A Canonical Multi-Domain Composite Index Framework for Cross-Country Comparative Assessment#343099
- INSTITUTIONS IN VILLAGE EMPOWERMENT AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT IN BANYUASIN REGENCY#343098
- Operator Geometries, Hankel Matrices, and the Transference of Computational Constraints#343097
- National Security and Deposit Money Banks Compliance with Banking Ethics#343096
- O espaço como constelação de indícios: Para uma semiótica percetiva da morfologia urbana#343095
- SOCIAL MEDIA AS A DIDACTIC STRATEGY FOR STRENGTHENING SCIENTIFIC COMPETENCE IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN INTERVENTION STUDY WITH FACEBOOK#343094
Source record · zenodo · Papers · License: Open Access
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — counts are materialised per sync from the index (real full-text coverage, never license entitlement).