peer-review

Documents about peer-review

• Official Review · ICLR 2024#787226OpenReview
• Peer work interventions for young people navigating hospital services: A systematic review#425712OSF
• Outcomes of Peer Coaching, Peer Tutoring, and Peer Mentoring Among International Students: A Scoping Review Protocol#327767OSF
• Comprehensive Consideration of Ethics in AI-assisted Scientific Writing and Peer Review.#412883PubMed
• Peer Support Program in Chronic Kidney Patient#845420ClinicalTrials.gov
• The Privilege and Power of Peer Review: Advancing Science With Integrity, Vigilance and Fairness.#448623Figshare
• Jury Theorems for Peer Review#117513PhilArchive
• Structural Peer Review of ``Epistemia'' Walter Quattrociocchi#696708PhilArchive
• Official Comment · ICLR 2026#787044OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2026#787052OpenReview
• Official Comment · NEURIPS 2023#787066OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2026#787069OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2026#787075OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2025#787082OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2025#787106OpenReview
• Official Comment · NEURIPS 2024#787125OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2025#787138OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2025#787166OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2025#787196OpenReview
• Official Comment · NEURIPS 2025#787213OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2026#787232OpenReview
• Official Comment · ICLR 2024#928178OpenReview
• Reciprocity: A transparent universal credit system to incentivize peer review#173500OSF
• A systematic approach to assessing the accuracy of a peer review process in an academic journal#225173Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada
• A New Paradigm for Scientific Publishing, Peer Review, and Impact Assessment#270356OSF
• Is Peer Review a Good Idea?#739484PhilArchive
• Pluralism and Peer Review in Philosophy#744049PhilArchive
• Who chooses open peer review and is it an indicator of article quality? An observational study of PLOS journals.#16028OSF
• Who chooses open peer review and is it an indicator of article quality? An observational study of PLOS journals.#473366OSF
• Applicants as reviewers: A mixed methods evaluation of the risks, benefits, and potential of distributed peer review for grant funding allocations#276815OSF
• The Necessity of Commensuration Bias in Grant Peer Review#75433PhilArchive
• Automated Peer Review and Citation-Grounded Models#687484PhilArchive
• AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot#14063arXiv CS
• Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future#149123arXiv CS
• Peer Review of the Quantum Computing Foundations of Artur Ekert#237195PhilArchive
• Peer Review of ``Strings from Almost Nothing'' by Clifford Cheung#707464PhilArchive
• Peer Review system: A Golden standard for publications process#747392PhilArchive
• Peer Review at Capacity: An editor's view#796990arXiv (OAI Expanded)
• Peer Review at Capacity: An editor's view#798403arXiv (All)
• Using Peer Review to Open Doors: Collaborative Community Review as Intervention Point#168972DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University
• Against the Peer Review Empire: How Knowledge Escaped the Ivory Tower#101967PhilArchive
• Peer Review#1055524UNF Digital Commons
• 33 U.S.C. § 2343 — Independent peer review#585310US Code (LII)
• 42 U.S.C. § 289a — Peer review requirements#595132US Code (LII)
• Active Learning With Peer-to-Peer Health Communication in School Health Education and Student Behavior Change: A Scoping Review.#354862NCBI PubMed Central
• Peer review Paola Ferrari CERN - eh siamo messi bene ah ah ah#91957PhilArchive
• Peer Review of ``Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe'' by Erik Verlinde#124994PhilArchive
• Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.#220934NCBI PubMed Central
• The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation#797587arXiv (OAI Expanded)
• The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation#799001arXiv (All)