supreme-court

Documents about supreme-court

• Review of the Supreme Court's 1990-91 Term and Preview of the 1991-92 Term for the Transnational Practitioner#648189Scholarly Commons
• Review of the Supreme Court's 1991-92 Term and Preview of the 1992-93 Term for the Transnational Practitioner#648190Scholarly Commons
• Review of the Supreme Court's 1988-89 Term and Preview of the 1989-90 Term for the Transnational Practitioner#648208Scholarly Commons
• Review of the Supreme Court's 1989-90 Term and Preview of the 1990-91 Term for the Transnational Practitioner#648216Scholarly Commons
• Rulings convicting nurses for care omissions in the Italian supreme court: A qualitative document analysis.#679678PubMed
• Ignoring Reality: Iowa Supreme Court Decides Case Involving "Oppression" by Majority Shareholder in Farm Corporation#964014ISUDR
• Right Problem; Wrong Solution#1019523Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• Murphy v. NCAA: The Constitutionality of State-Authorized Sports Gambling#1021872Texas A&M Law Scholarship
• In re Law#503770CourtListener
• Alive But Not Well: Manifest Disregard After Hall Street#167597Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
• Alternatives to The Federalist: The more accurate way to understand the original meaning of the Constitution#167678Harvard DASH
• A New Age Dawns on First Street: The Supreme Court’s Use of <i>Loper Bright</i> During the October 2024 Term#191343Scholars Crossing
• SDQ, R. v (Re Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court) [2026] EWCA Crim 828 (21 May 2026)#324714BAILII
• Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP [2026] UKSC 18 (01 July 2026)#329232BAILII Supreme Court
• Access to Abortion for US Military Service Members in 2024 After the#335941PubMed
• Reconstituting a Constitution, and a Republic: The Architecture of Authoritarian Rule#393558Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
• Nigro v. United States: The Most Disingenuous Supreme Court Opinion, Ever#494918UC College of Law
• Marin v. Constitutional Realty, LLC#503650CourtListener
• State v. Law#503754CourtListener
• Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal#609545CourtListener
• Nouvelle approche sur le principe de primauté du droit de l'Union européenne au regard de la suprématie américaine#624704HAL (France)
• Firearms and Fora: Constructing Public Carry Doctrine#317114William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• ''Here Comes Da Judge"#398417Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
• Campbell at 30: A Retrospective Appreciation#668974Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law
• The Sick Chicken Case: The US Supreme Court and the New Deal by Williamjames Hull Hoffer#672638Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law
• Consenting to Adjudication Outside the Article III Courts#1019615Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• Amusement & Music Operators Ass'n v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal#609568CourtListener
• Amusement & Music Operators Ass'n v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal#609569CourtListener
• Corrective Justice and Constitutional Torts#167560Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
• Legal Innovation Within the Wider Intellectual Tradition: The Pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.#335487OpenAlex
• Transitive reduction of citation networks#379307Spiral
• The "Rebellion" of William 0. Douglas#398416Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
• What Did <em>Gitlow</em> Do?#453803William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• G. W. McGinty Supreme Court of Louisiana Brief#939131Louisiana Tech Digital Commons
• Quaye, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice (PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS) [2026] UKSC 34 (22 September 2026)#1043292BAILII Supreme Court
• Manno v. Hayes Law Practice, PLLC#503741CourtListener
• Stinnett v. Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC#503779CourtListener
• Protecting Raw Data and Psychological Tests from Wrongful Disclosure: A Primer on the Law and Other Persuasive Strategies#295588OpenAlex
• An Analysis of How the Coverage of Abortion in Media Reports Highlights Struggles for Millions of American Women Nationwide#311367DigitalCommons@CalPoly
• Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Putusan M.A. Nomor 2029_K/Pid.Sus/ 2023 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam#382992Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman
• “PLAUSIBLE CAUSE”?: HOW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CAN ILLUMINATE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S NEW GENERAL PLEADING STANDARD IN CIVIL SUITS#494735UC College of Law
• The Minimal, Parallel Modern Effect of Courts on Public Opinion: Evidence from 44 Years of Experiments#976978OSF
• Pick a Number, Any Number: State Representation in Congress After the 2000 Census#1019399Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• The Origin of Article I, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution#1019820Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• The Need for Revisiting the Imposition of Bad Faith Liability: <em>Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kallevig</em>#1020051Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• Out of the Quandary: Personal Jurisdiction Over Absent Class Member Claims Explained#453787William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• Five Lessons from Ken Kersch’s Conservatives and the Constitution for the Present Moment#169570Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law
• The strange case of the superfluous sentence#179691Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law
• Constitutional amendments and constitutional core values: the Brazilian case in a comparative perspective#955469Koc University Digital Collections
• Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government#1019702Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law