arXiv (All)
open access
Carrot and Stick: Eliciting Comparison Data and Beyond
Comparison data elicited from people are fundamental to many machine learning tasks, including reinforcement learning from human feedback for large language models and estimating ranking models. They are typically subjective and not directly verifiable. How to truthfully elicit such comparison data
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- XAI-Arena: Can LLMs Assess the Quality of XAI Explanations?#987176
- World Models Meet Language Models: On the Complementarity of Concrete and Abstract Reasoning#798936
- World Models Meet Language Models: On the Complementarity of Concrete and Abstract Reasoning#797522
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- The Illusion of $\textit{What If}$: Evaluating the Breakdown of Counterfactual Reasoning in LLMs#781229
Record · ID 1011985
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive