OSF
open access
How Long Do Refutational Text Effects Last? Evidence From a Six-Month Follow-Up Study of Misconceptions in Psychology
cognitive-psychologydevelopmental-psychologyeducational-psychologyquantitative-methodssocial-and-behavioral-sciences
This work analyzes the effectiveness of refutational texts in correcting misconceptions in psychology and the stability of that change. To this end, it focuses on two variables: the level of engagement with the texts and the specific nature of different myths. The prevalence of misconceptions in the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- What Fifty Years of Research on the Misinformation Effect Can Tell Us: A Meta-Analytic Review#1159806
- The limited effects of social media use on misperceptions Social media's limited role in misperceptions.#1158980
- What Fifty Years of Research on the Misinformation Effect Can Tell Us: A Meta-Analytic Review#16183
- Breaking Down Educational Myths: Predictors of Misconceptions and Insights from Refutation Interventions#634386
- On Classical Paradoxes...#88771
Record · ID 1040313 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive