arXiv (All)
open access
An Honest Effect Size for Contingency Tables: Why Nothing Can Be Unbiased, Where to Put the Error Instead, and How to Route the Report
Cramer's V is the effect size reported beside almost every chi-square test, read against Cohen's labels, yet a large fraction of such numbers describe sampling noise and the standard bias correction (Bergsma 2013) does not fix it. We assemble three results and claim only the consequence of each. Fir
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Exact Noise Floor for Contingency-Table Effect Sizes: A Per-Table Reporting Gate, and How Often It Would Change Reported Magnitudes#1062031
- Record Linkage Error and Inference in Population Research#439842
- Table 25. Excluded studies and reasons for their exclusion#140907
- Is the regression $F$-test doubly robust?#1145072
- 15 U.S.C. § 183 — Report of statistics#566879
Record · ID 1062111
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive