arXiv (All)
open access
SafeLoop: Risk-Aware Rollback for Vision-Language-Action Manipulation
Recent vision-language-action (VLA) models are promising for general-purpose manipulation, but long-horizon execution remains fragile. Small state-estimation or control errors can lead to irreversible failures (e.g., collisions and object drops). Avoiding these risks requires a proactive safety mech
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?#1116881
- Vision-Language-Action Safety: Threats, Challenges, Evaluations, and Mechanisms#141781
- SafeVLA-Bench: A Benchmark for the Success-Safety Gap in Vision-Language-Action Models#1144821
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#793321
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#789317
Record · ID 1062210
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive