CanLII
metadata only
Lapointe and Francoeur v R.
Decided: 2026-09-17. Docket: 96-25-CA. Citation: 2026 NBCA 109 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeals against conviction — Sexual assault — Criminal Code, s. 271(a) — Convictions for sexual assault following provincial court trial — Grounds of appeal alleging errors on consent, honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent, and trial fairness — Standard of review under Criminal Code, s. 675(1)(a) — Appeals dismissed | Criminal and statutory offences — Sexual assault — Consent — R. v. Barton — Whether the judge erred in finding the complainant did not consent — Consent assessed as the complainant’s subjective internal state of mind — Flirtation, passivity, and surrounding circumstances rejected as establishing consent — Actus reus and mens rea found proven beyond a reasona
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Prejudicial Effects of 'Reasonable Steps' in Analysis of Mens Rea and Sexual Consent: Two Solutions#774896
- S.M. c. R.#1090907
- Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?#774854
- The Social Construction of Gender: Attitudes on Sexual Assault#493265
- R. v. Trowbridge#1158536
Record · ID 1066679
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive