CanLII
metadata only
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-23. Docket: A-36-25. Citation: 2026 FCA 158 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — CRA benefits eligibility — Canada Recovery Benefit and Canada Emergency Response Benefit — Application for judicial review concerning CRA ineligibility determination — Extension of time sought to commence judicial review — Federal Court held interests of justice not served absent shown merit — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Time limits — Extension of time to commence judicial review — Canada (Attorney General) v. Larkman, 2012 FCA 204 — Whether potential merit must be shown on an extension motion — No suggested grounds for judicial review provided in submissions in chief — Absence of potential merit determinative — Appeal dismissed with costs | Evidence — Motion practice — Reply ma
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- DesRoches v. Canada#1158532
- Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1090899
- Shahid v Sattar#928689
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
Record · ID 1079781
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive