arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
E2A-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence-to-Action Reliability in Financial Chart Reasoning
Can financial vision-language models (VLMs) turn chart evidence into reliable action recommendations? Existing hallucination evaluations are mostly claim-centric; they assess whether generated statements are supported, but not whether evidence remains traceable through rationale, confidence, and fin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Price of Thought: Does Test-Time Reasoning Pay in LLM Trading?#1105264
- Overconfidence and Calibration in Medical VQA: Empirical Findings and Hallucination-Aware Mitigation#1142654
- FinRegQA-EU: Corruption-Based Preference Data for Grounded EU Financial Regulatory Question Answering#1132057
- CAME: Company-Aware Evidence-Memory Experts for Interpretable Quarter-Ahead Revenue Forecasting#1117855
- TestHallVQA: Exploring LVLMs' Document-Level Reasoning under Redundant Contexts from Scientific Exams#1070967
Record · ID 1083754
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive