ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
Comparison of results after rTARUP and lap IPOM in patients with small- and medium-sized ventral hernia. Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Experience of IPOM Technique in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair#829251
- Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy: Double-point VS Single-point#1104144
- Clinical Trial to Compare TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) vs TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) y Approach for Women's Inguinal Hernia on an Outpatient Basis#851562
- Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain#903948
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Chronic Postsurgical Orchalgia#807071
Record · ID 1094236
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive