arXiv (All)
open access
From annotation to reasoning: Culture in language models
How should we evaluate language models when more than one interpretation can be right? Cultural benchmarks often test factual knowledge, agreement with survey responses, or recognition of a predefined meaning. These tasks leave open whether a model can explain how a cultural reference works in a par
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Systematic Comparison of Multilingual Interpretability Methods Reveals Anisotropy-Driven Failures#971485
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
- Do Not Trust the Benchmark: Limitations of General LLM Rankings and a Case for Task-Specific Evaluation#1048945
- Evaluating large language model performance in Risk of Bias assessments: A cross-sectional validation study.#358209
- EviScope: Paired Counterfactual Evidence Diagnostics for Faithful and Efficient Grounded Language Models#1123475
Record · ID 1105456
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive