arXiv (All)
open access
ConflictVLA-Bench: Benchmarking Behavioral Responses of Vision-Language-Action Models to Premise Conflicts
While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models perform strongly on manipulation tasks, their responses to invalid task premises remain underexplored. Existing evaluations of premise conflicts often focus on terminal task outcomes, yet task failure alone cannot distinguish behavioral disengagement from co
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GIFT: Goal-Injected Fine-Tuning for Efficient Manipulation Policy Adaptation#975075
- FPCO-Dialog: A Multi-Turn False-Premise Benchmark for Correction and Cooperation in Vision-Language Models#926259
- Refusals That Bend: Measuring and Predicting Task Malleability in Embodied VLM Planners#1143938
- Refusals That Bend: Measuring and Predicting Task Malleability in Embodied VLM Planners#1136783
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models#1129131
Record · ID 1115748
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive