arXiv (All)
open access
Capability Provenance in Language Models: A Case Study in Social Reasoning
We use training-data attribution as an interpretable tool for capability discovery, mapping which regions of the pretraining corpus support social reasoning versus STEM reasoning in OLMo3-7B. Training-data attribution measures how strongly each training document influences a model's predictions on a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Althea: The Fact-Checking--Metalearning Tradeoff in AI-Assisted Verification#1049753
- Co-FactChecker: A Framework for Human-AI Collaborative Claim Verification Using Large Reasoning Models#1061700
- Knowing When to Critique: Task-Adaptive Metacognitive Regulation for Reliable LLM Reasoning#1118403
- Generation Provenance Before Behavior Attribution: Auditing Synthetic Speech Research Objects#1156650
- Do LLM Attribution Metrics Transfer? Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation Across Datasets and Constructs#1013597
Record · ID 1118614
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive