arXiv (All)
open access
Where Scientific Search Agents Fail: Decision-Checkpoint Auditing of Exposure and Inspection Attempts
Final-answer accuracy does not reveal whether a scientific-search agent failed to encounter a target paper, attempt to inspect it, or return an accepted answer after inspection. We introduce decision checkpoints that record observations and tool actions without benchmark labels during inference, the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers#998670
- The geometry of AI validation: From structural blindness to reusable audits#1070909
- ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worlds#1078270
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#793033
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#789029
Record · ID 1143271
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive