arXiv (All)
open access
How the Audit Rule Shapes Faithful Factor Explanations in LLMs
Large language models are often asked which input factors influenced their outputs. For structured inputs, such reports can be checked by counterfactual perturbation, but each factor must be queried multiple times to estimate its effect, so verification is usually budget-limited. We study how this l
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Auditing Agent Actions through Query-Conditioned Attribution#1118749
- Do LLM Attribution Metrics Transfer? Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation Across Datasets and Constructs#1013597
- LLM-CEG: Extending the Classification Error Gauge Framework for Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models#138851
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#799579
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#798156
Record · ID 1156786
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive