CanLII
metadata only
R. v. Trowbridge
Decided: 2026-09-25. Docket: COA-24-CR-0082. Citation: 2026 ONCA 673 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Jury charge — Sexual assault — Vitiation of consent — Whether trial judge erred by refusing a Zhao instruction on vitiated consent — Constructive first degree murder predicated on sexual assault and unlawful act — Consent to strangulation and bodily harm left as binary non-consent issue — Error found — Acquittal set aside | Criminal and statutory offences — Appeals — New trial — Remedy — Whether failure to instruct on vitiated consent had a material bearing on acquittal — Crown onus on appeal from acquittal, Graveline and Hodgson — Jury may have acquitted based on reasonable doubt on non-consent — New trial limited to lesser included offence — New trial on manslaughter ordered |
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 1158536
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive