CanLII
metadata only
R v Ross
Decided: 2026-09-10. Docket: CACR3995. Citation: 2026 SKCA 103 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Sentencing — Manslaughter — Criminal Code, s. 236 — Appeal against sentence following guilty plea and conviction — Whether eight-year imprisonment is demonstrably unfit — Range of 4 to 12 years and seven-year starting point considered — Comparable cases reviewed — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Appeals — Sentence appeal — Criminal Code, s. 675(1)(b) — Standard of review in appeals against sentence — Whether sentencing judge erred in principle affecting sentence — R v Friesen and R v Lacasse applied — No basis to intervene and vary sentence — Appeal dismissed | Criminal and statutory offences — Sentencing — Principles and objectives — Denunciation and deterrence emphasised for manslaug
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v IA#1039747
- R. v. P.B.#1158538
- R v Haddad#1146889
- Observaciones al Anteproyecto del Código Penal#947909
- R v Aarons#1166780
Record · ID 1001769
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive