CanLII
metadata only
R. v. W.W.
Decided: 2026-09-25. Docket: COA-23-CR-0450. Citation: 2026 ONCA 672 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Sexual offences — Sexual interference — Convictions for sexual interference involving step-grandchildren — Touching during “tickling” in basement and at swimming pool — Appellant acknowledged touching but denied sexual purpose — Appeal based solely on ineffective assistance of counsel — Convictions upheld — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Appeals — Ineffective assistance of counsel — Whether defence strategy contradicted jury instructions and required severance — Trial record used to identify defence actually advanced — Defence that touching had no sexual purpose and forced intercourse did not happen — Failure to pursue severance not shown to cause miscarriage of justice — Appeal
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Raping and Importance of the Hymen at Forensic Medicine#706535
- R v IA#1039747
- R v Hunjan#1053819
- NRS-2817 | Depositions [Bingara Court of Petty Sessions]#336997
- R. v. Luckman#1166769
Record · ID 1158537
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive