CanLII
metadata only
R v Hunjan
Decided: 2026-09-10. Citation: 2026 MBCA 76 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal — Sexual offences — Criminal Code, s. 162(1), s. 162.1(1) — Conviction appeal from voyeurism and making available an intimate image without consent — Statutory elements and contextual privacy analysis applied — Trial judge’s findings upheld — Unreasonable verdict ground consequentially rejected — Conviction appeals dismissed | Criminal and statutory offences — Voyeurism — Surreptitiously — Criminal Code, s. 162(1)(b) — Whether observation of sexual assault was done surreptitiously — Meaning of “surreptitiously” as state of mind, R v Trinchi — Complainant asleep and unaware, no consent or ability to consent — Inference of intent complainant remain unaware supported — Appeal dismissed | Criminal an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v IA#1039747
- R v Ross#1001769
- R v Haddad#1146889
- R. v. W.W.#1158537
- The Raping and Importance of the Hymen at Forensic Medicine#706535
Record · ID 1053819
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive