arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
AppliedScientist: Automated Scientific Revision Through Iterative AI Reviewing
Automated reviewing systems are increasingly evaluated based on the quality of the reviews they produce. Yet a review is only useful if acting on it leads to a measurable improvement in the paper. We present AppliedScientist, a closed-loop system that couples an autonomous AI scientist with an AI re
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- CALIBRATED AI REVIEWER: AN ALGORITHM FOR COMPARING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS WITH HIGH AND LOW ENTRY BARRIERS#141283
- FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Research#1061677
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
- OpenDiscoveryTrace: Process Traces for Evaluating AI Scientist Workflows#986976
Record · ID 1160731
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive