Sharma v. 1320105 Ontario Inc.

Decided: 2026-10-01. Docket: T-2142-24. Citation: 2026 CanLII 103194 (FC). Administrative law — Judicial review — Privacy Commissioner — Refusal to investigate complaint under PIPEDA for lack of jurisdiction — Whether grounds on interpretation and application of subparagraph 4(1)(a) of PIPEDA may proceed — Court retains application on merits while striking unrelated grounds — Motion granted in part | Procedure — Motion to strike — Federal Courts Rules, Rule 301 — Whether the Fresh as Amended Notice of Application is non-compliant or “doomed to fail” — Requirement for “precise” relief and “complete and concise” grounds — Plenary jurisdiction to restrain abuse of process — Some paragraphs struck, balance maintained | Procedure — Remedies on judicial review — Federal Courts Act, subs. 18.1(3)