CanLII
metadata only
Cai v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-14. Docket: T-4004-25; T-4003-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1154 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Procedural fairness — Second review of benefit eligibility — Whether moderate procedural fairness required more than voicemail messages — Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) factors and Zhang v Canada (Attorney General) considered — Three attempts and voicemail messages left with deadline — Applications dismissed | Pensions and social benefits — COVID-19 benefits — Canada Recovery Benefit — Whether CRB ineligibility decision was reasonable on evidence of 50% income reduction — Canada Recovery Benefits Act, s 2, s 3 applied — Tax returns and CRA records reviewed in file notes — No verification obtained due to no return call — Ineligibility maintaine
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- Sharma v. 1320105 Ontario Inc.#1166763
- Dhaliwal v. Canada (Attorney General)#1079781
- O'Driscoll v. Canada (Public Safety)#928680
- Salha v. Canada (Attorney General)#1120800
Record · ID 928678
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive