OpenAlex
metadata only
Peter Hacker on Definition in Jurisprudence
The article deals with the study of the problem of the definability of fundamental legal concepts, in particular, and the evaluation of the place of the theory of definition in modern jurisprudence, as a whole.The critical arguments of Peter Hacker against the dominant in analytical legal philosophy
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Less Incorrect Ways of Doing Jurisprudence#1177771
- The Crisis of Modern Jurisprudence#1177936
- Jurisprudence theory and context#335382
- The Problem of Methodological Fixation of Analytical Jurisprudence#1177751
- The problem of doctrinal justification of legal sources in the context of the theory of legal argumentation, hermeneutics, and Ronald Dworkin's integrative jurisprudence#1177660
Record · ID 1178161
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive