arXiv (All)
open access
Priority Coordination Games: Hodge Decomposition and a Sharp Design Limit
In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer of a hierarchical controller. Such interactions are routinely replaced by a potential game, i.e.\ by a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Commitment Hierarchies under Intent Revision: A Belief-Revision Account of Salvage in Tool-Use Agents#1141775
- Effect of WHO-yaws Elimination Strategy in Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea#201833
- Policy-Based Management Framework for the Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA)#502187
- A Polynomial-Time Test for Peak-Oriented Rationalizability#1078113
- 16 U.S.C. § 1456 — Coordination and cooperation#569047
Record · ID 1202251
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive