arXiv (All)
open access
Axiom Satisfiability of Linear Rewards in Alignment
Learning from human preference data is the dominant route to aligning language models with human values. In linear social choice, where rewards are linear in a fixed feature representation of prompt-response pairs, Ge et al.[2024] show that fitting such a reward by minimizing any non-decreasing conv
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Understanding Helpfulness and Harmless Tension in Reward Models#1342526
- Are Human-Aligned Models Models of Humans? A Turing-Test Gap in Preference Alignment#1052296
- Learning Ordinal Probabilistic Reward from Preferences#1326204
- Tail Competition Explains Scaling in Best-of-N Sampling for Verifiable Problems#1345185
- Can You Trust Your Preference Models? Stackelberg Games for Alignment#1325904
Record · ID 1215974
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive