arXiv (All)
open access
You All Need to Hear This: Wisdom of Crowds with Deliberating Jurors
We analyze a formal model of deliberation in which agents have probabilistic access to evidence and selectively disclose it to their peers in order to induce opinion change. We present theoretical and simulation results that tackle the question: does deliberation improve the collective accuracy of t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Does Defendant Statement Matter? A Study of Bias and Persuasion in LLM-Simulated Jurors#996700
- Communicate and Vote: Collective Truth-tracking in Networks#723036
- Optimizing Individual and Collective Reliability: A Puzzle#699484
- Role differentiation as ignition of a collective information engine: Structuration in Agent Populations#998396
- What it Might Be like to Be a Group Agent#746171
Record · ID 1216479
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive