arXiv (All)
open access
Who Wrote It Is Not Enough: Detecting Who Contributed the Insight
As LLMs increasingly assist scientific writing and peer review, detecting who wrote the text is no longer sufficient: we need to determine who contributed the underlying insight. We introduce Insight Provenance, the task of identifying whether a review insight originates from a human, an LLM, or the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Is This Book AI-Generated?" How Authorship Suspicion Manifests in Marketplace Reviews#1119023
- From Citations to Contributions: LLM-Assisted Credit Scoring of Research Articles#984580
- LLM assisted writing deserves empirical evaluation#1155295
- More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review#973418
- A role for judgment aggregation in coauthoring scientific papers#703017
Record · ID 1216740
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive