PhilArchive
open access
System-Derivation Ontology - A Formal Category for Consciousness Studies
Major theoretical programs in consciousness studies disagree about what consciousness is while tacitly agreeing on whose consciousness is at issue. The system whose integration is measured, whose workspace is mapped, whose free energy is minimized is presupposed by each framework, not derived within it. This agreement is not benign: it fixes the referent of every downstream claim, constrains what counts as an explanation, and thereby determines which questions can be asked, which answers can count as valid, and which disagreements can be meaningfully adjudicated. This paper argues that every major consciousness framework contains a binding point at which a system must already be specified for its formalism to apply, and that this binding point is not eliminable from within the framework — the dependence is ontological, not methodological. The paper introduces System-Derivation Ontology (SDO) as the formal category for theories that operate at the level where systemhood itself is determined, requiring derivation of persistence-capable boundaries under perturbation as endogenously maintained units rather than identification of boundaries in systems whose separability is already given. The category is distinguished from adjacent positions — panprotopsychism, Russellian monism, and the autonomy tradition — with which it is liable to be conflated. Existing consciousness frameworks are placed as operating at a different explanatory level than SDO: Integrated Information Theory measures integration of an already individuated system, Global Workspace Theory describes coordination within an already individuated system, and the Free Energy Principle describes maintenance strategies available to an already individuated system. These placements are not competitive reclassifications but dependency placements. System-based frameworks are conditional on a prior individuation decision; SDO names the class of theories that render that decision derivable rather than assumed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- System, Subsystem, Hive: boundary problems in computational theories of consciousness#732973
- The Description–Ontology Gap: A Methodological Reconstruction#729761
- The Structural Universality of Persistence Architecture: Physics, biology, cognition, evolution - and the diagnostic use in designed systems#689106
- The Boundary Discipline: Where the Lens Starts, Stops, and Applies to Itself#688607
- The Back End Law: The Gate–Π–River Framework, Universal Grammar And The Law of Irreversibility And Transition#237221
Record · ID 122432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive