CanLII
metadata only
Dawoud v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-06. Docket: T-4006-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1231 (CanLII). Administrative law — Procedural fairness — Judicial review — Whether Applicant had a meaningful opportunity to know and meet the case — Second ground of ineligibility for earning $1,000 or more not raised in Decision letter — No opportunity to respond during Second Review — Process tainted and confidence in outcome lost — Decision quashed and remitted | Administrative law — Reasonableness review — Reasons — Whether the CRA Agent’s reasons were sufficiently transparent and intelligible — Failure to meaningfully engage with the offer letter and Applicant’s explanation — Conclusion that Applicant earned $1,000 or more unsupported on the record — Court unable to connect the dots under Vavilov — Application for judicial re
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- Detre v. Canada (Attorney General)#1219743
- Are-Canada No. 5 Holdings c. 9510-8528 Québec inc.#1090904
- Shaabouk v. Canada (Revenue Agency)#1359992
Record · ID 1236045
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive