CanLII
metadata only
Gutauskas v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-06. Docket: T-1833-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1230 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Vavilov framework — Whether Final Decision was reasonable on CERB periods 1–3 — Reliance on record before CRA and missing March 2020 to May 10, 2020 statements — CRA not required to fill gaps in supporting documentation — Application dismissed | Evidence — Burden of proof — Supporting documentation — Canada Emergency Response Benefit Act, subs. 5(3) — Whether CRA could require identification of deposits and complete bank statements — Volume of documents and unhighlighted deposits considered — Onus on Applicant to provide “any information” needed — Finding upheld | Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Canada Recovery Benefits Act, subs. 3(1), pa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mendioro v. Canada (Attorney General)#1090886
- Salha v. Canada (Attorney General)#1120800
- DesRoches v. Canada#1158532
- Thibodeau v. Canada (Public Services and Procurement)#1158533
- Itzovitch v. Canada (Attorney General)#1166758
Record · ID 1236046
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive