OSF
open access
Who Is Responsible for the Findings? Researcher Agency and Expertise in Quantitative Educational Research in the Age of AI
and-researchartificial-intelligenceeducational-assessmentevaluationreproducibilityresearch-methodologyscience-and-mathematics-education
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are transforming how quantitative research is conducted. This essay reflects on how four core practices—method selection, coding, result interpretation, and reproducibility—have shifted in the age of AI, and its implications for researcher expertise and accountabil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence#1296917
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#673570
- Evaluating AI-Assisted Psychoeducational Report Writing: A Framework for Utility, Equity, and Defensibility#1098631
- Evaluating AI-Assisted Psychoeducational Report Writing: A Framework for Utility, Equity, and Defensibility#1098542
- ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE#221965
Record · ID 1241508
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive