CanLII
metadata only
Beder v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Decided: 2026-10-07. Docket: T-2222-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1237 (CanLII). Access to information — Privacy Act — Application under s. 41 — Essential requirements for s. 41 relief — Whether there was a continuing refusal of access at the hearing — Requirement for an OPC report under s. 35, Statham v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation — Court lacks jurisdiction where only remedy is disclosure — Notice of Application struck out | Access to information — Privacy Act — Mootness — Deemed refusal and subsequent response — Whether the application is moot after the applicant has received a response — Scope of “remedied” deemed refusal, Sir v Canada (Royal Mounted Police) — Dissatisfaction with contents of disclosure does not prevent mootness — Application dismissed | Procedure — Motion to strike — Ple
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fearing v. Gardaworld Cash Services Canada Corporation#1347091
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- Aldahleh v. Zayed#1066670
- Adams v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1266820
- Diaz Bravo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#976598
Record · ID 1266816
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive