CanLIImetadata only
Diaz Bravo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1164, 2026 fc 1164 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1164, (canlii), imm-8927-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, pre, removal risk assessment, new evidence, irpa, s. 113(a), whether the prra officer could refuse to consider undated or pre, rad evidence, requirement to show personalized, forward, looking risk in prra submissions, some evidence excluded as not dated or not linked to risk, application for judicial review dismissed, administrative law, judicial review, mootness, borowski v canada (attorney general), whether the application was moot following removal to chile, discretion to decide despite mootness assessed through adversarial context, judicial economy, lawmaking role, court exercised discretion to hear merits notwithstanding mootness, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, state protection, irpa, ss. 96 and 97, whether the officer reasonably found state protection available in chile, presumption of consideration of evidence, cepeda, gutierrez v canada (minister of citizenship and immigration), country condition evidence on police protection for women considered not material to alleged risk, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, risk assessment, whether the officer reasonably found allegations related to the mother’s activism speculative, letter evidence said not to mention the raid and indicated agents sought the mother, not applicants, each claim assessed on its own merits despite mother’s successful claim, officer’s weighing of evidence upheld, application for judicial review dismissed
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 976598
Retrieved via
Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.