OSF
open access
Johnson v. Superintendent Fayette SCI: Severing Ties with Pronoun Substitutions in Bruton Cases
This Casebrief examines the Third Circuit’s decision in Johnson v. Superintendent Fayette SCI and argues that the court correctly found a Sixth Amendment violation where a co-defendant’s confession implicated the defendant through neutral pronoun substitutions. While endorsing the grant of habeas re
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Problematics Implementation of Law and Regulations Testing in Indonesia#1042589
- 18 U.S.C. § 3558 — Implementation of a sentence#573320
- Court-Stripping, Court-Packing, and Court Defying: Revisiting the Supreme Court’s Essential Functions#278083
- Judicial Activism and Fourteenth Amendment Privacy Claims: The Allure of Originalism and the Unappreciated Promise of Constrained Nonoriginalism#493779
- 17 CFR Part 148 — Implementation of the Equal Access to Justice Act in Covered Adjudicatory Proceedings Before the Commission#506282
Record · ID 1267880
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive