arXiv (All)
open access
Language2Drive: Do Vision-Language-Action Models Really Follow the Instructions in Autonomous Driving?
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models increasingly use natural-language instructions to condition autonomous driving behavior. Yet existing closed-loop benchmarks primarily measure route completion, safety, and rule compliance, leaving a fundamental question unresolved: does language actually d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- BLUE: Toward Better Language Use in Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving#793721
- BLUE: Toward Better Language Use in Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving#789717
- CARE: Certifying Acceleration for Vision-Language-Action Inference#1232956
- I-Perceive: A Foundation Model for Active Perception with Language Instructions#609880
- VL-DPO: Vision-Language-Guided Finetuning for Preference-Aligned Autonomous Driving#204822
Record · ID 1341523
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive