arXiv (All)
open access
Reference Wording Shapes Retrieval of Robot Task Instructions
Identifying a robot task from a short instruction is sensitive to which descriptions are available for retrieval. We investigate this effect in the natural-language instructions included with the RLBench manipulation benchmark. We extract 296 fixed descriptions from 62 publicly available task files
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Identifying Crucial Attention Heads for Multilingual Language Models: Retrieval and Retrieval-Transition Heads#1070770
- Beyond Semantics: How Temporal Biases Shape Retrieval in Transformer and State-Space Models#1141451
- How Do Instructions Shape Speech? Cross-Attention Attribution for Style-Captioned Text-to-Speech#290606
- Do Vision-Language-Action Models Understand Instructions? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study on Language Grounding#1234545
- RoboIRGBench: Benchmarking Implicit Referential Grounding in Vision-Language-Action Models#1128656
Record · ID 1342763
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive