CanLII
metadata only
R. v. King
Decided: 2026-10-06. Docket: COA-26-OM-0372. Citation: 2026 ONCA 725 (CanLII). Procedure — Criminal appeals — Extension of time — R. v. Menear factors — Whether interests of justice required an extension of time to appeal convictions and sentence — No bona fide intention within the appeal period and no reasonable explanation for delay — Proposed appeal merit and prejudice considered — Motion dismissed | Procedure — Mode of trial — Re-election — Criminal Code, s. 561 — Whether re-election from judge and jury to judge alone was not clear, unequivocal and informed — Record showed counsel understood options including adjournment with an explicit s. 11(b) waiver — Trial judge treated re-election as an option and allowed private consultation — No apparent merit — Motion dismissed | Rights and fr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- Yenovkian v. Shirtliff-Hinds Professional Corporation#976606
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- Diaz Bravo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#976598
Record · ID 1347103
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive