arXiv (All)
open access
Change the Number, Change the Answer: Assessing Rating Scale Sensitivity in LLM-Based Text Scoring
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in computational social science to assign scalar scores to social and psychological constructs. However, studies use different rating scales, and whether their scores remain comparable across scale designs is understudied. To address this gap, we de
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Change the Number, Change the Answer: Assessing Rating Scale Sensitivity in LLM-Based Text Scoring#1348902
- Does Reasoning Improve Psychological Depth in Large Language Models? It Depends on Who's Judging#1083274
- Structure vs. Chain-of-Thought: Evaluating LLM Criteria Extraction for Depression Severity#1144016
- Reliability, validity, and diagnostic evidence for multi-model LLM short-answer scoring#973898
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
Record · ID 1357842
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive