Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository
metadata only
The Roles of Attorneys as Courtroom Experts: Revisiting the Conventional Limitations and their Exceptions
This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially in the legal malpractice context. This Article starts by addressing the unclear distinction between questions of law and fact and reviews several recent cases that prohibited expert legal testimony. Nex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Thought of Legal Research with Examples and Demonstrations#744812
- The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation: approaches from legal theory and argumentation theory#269817
- The problem of doctrinal justification of legal sources in the context of the theory of legal argumentation, hermeneutics, and Ronald Dworkin's integrative jurisprudence#1177660
- Interpreting Legal Findings: A Critical Discussion of Results in Light of Jurisprudential Frameworks#1237139
- Unlocking the Power of Persuasion: Using the Five-Paragraph Essay for Effective Oral Advocacy Among Foreign-Trained Attorney#1067930
Record · ID 1368805
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive