arXiv (All)
open access
NEXUS: Learning Safety Constraints and Action Models for Safe and Robust Embodied Planning
Large language models (LLMs) enable embodied agents to plan from naturallanguage instructions, yet their actions may be physically infeasible or hazardous. Existing neuro-symbolic learners primarily refine execution models, while formal safety methods acquire or enforce safety constraints. This sepa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Using large language models for embodied planning introduces systematic safety risks#120522
- Rethinking World Models for Safety-Critical Embodied Systems#926660
- EnactOpt: Diagnosis-Guided Harness Evolution for Embodied Agents#1325873
- SafeBranch: Branch-Pair Safety Alignment for Embodied Agents#1342588
- Risky-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Safety Risks in Real-World Life-Assist Deployments#1326197
Record · ID 1387057
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive