CanLII
metadata only
Kasak v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-10-16. Docket: IMM-29408-26. Citation: 2026 CanLII 108994 (FC). Citizenship and immigration — Stay of removal — PRRA judicial review — Whether Applicant met RJR-MacDonald and Toth tripartite test — Serious issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience analysed — Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, subs. 48(2) and Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, s. 232 considered — Stay of removal granted | Administrative law — Procedural fairness — PRRA decision-making — Whether non-disclosure of Officer’s research created a procedural fairness defect — Whether internal flight alternative had to be raised with Applicant — Decision-maker’s reasons and rationale referenced with Vavilov v Canada (MCI) — Serious issue found for judicial review — Stay motion allowed | Evidenc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Asghar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1347090
- Yenovkian v. Shirtliff-Hinds Professional Corporation#976606
- Singh Maan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1158534
- Ibarra Sandi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1347094
- Celik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1219745
Record · ID 1391007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive