Crossref
metadata only
Governance Consequences of Risk-Based AI Regulation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis of the EU AI Act and Viet Nam Law
Abstract Risk-based artificial intelligence regulation is usually presented as a settlement between innovation and control. This article instead examines the institutional work that follows when legal systems turn risk into duties, records, review and remedies. It compares Regulati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare#679067
- Pre-Generative AI perspectives: Risk and promise in Vietnam’s state media narratives on artificial intelligence (2016–2022)#82707
- Normative Inflation and the Crying Wolf Effect in the International Governance of AI#115123
- Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement Operations: The EU AI Act as the Governing Legal Standard#1159915
- Bridging the Gap in the Responsible AI Divides#1388344
Record · ID 1418157
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive