arXiv (All)
open access
Silicon Samples Match the Answers but Not the Respondents
Silicon sampling generates survey respondents by having a large language model (LLM) answer a survey as a person with given demographic attributes, and the resulting synthetic populations are increasingly used in place of human ones. Existing evaluations focus on individual-answer accuracy, per-ques
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Silicon sampling answers with country-level assumptions, not individual attitudes: Cross-national evidence from the European Social Survey#1110755
- Mitigating Social Desirability Bias in Random Silicon Sampling#1199734
- Where Silicon Samples Go Wrong: Item-Level Coefficient Distortion in LLM-Simulated Chinese Public Opinion#1318048
- Where Silicon Samples Go Wrong: Item-Level Coefficient Distortion in LLM-Simulated Chinese Public Opinion#1313716
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
Record · ID 1424018
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive