CanLII
metadata only
R. v. Mann
Decided: 2026-10-20. Docket: COA-25-CR-1437. Citation: 2026 ONCA 740 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeals — Conviction appeal — Strong circumstantial case — Whether any basis exists to interfere with trial reasons — Trial judge considered all evidence and made available factual conclusions — No error in reasons for judgment — Conviction appeal dismissed | Procedure — Adjournment — Appeal hearing — Alleged non-receipt of appeal book — Whether adjournment should be granted on these bases — Crown satisfied court appellant received appeal book with written confirmation — Adjournment request dismissed and appeal proceeded — Adjournment refused | Evidence — Fresh evidence — Third-party suspect — Proposed evidence speculative — Whether fresh evidence request warranted an adjournmen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Ross#1001769
- R v Musick#1368062
- R v Aarons#1166780
- Electronic Court Filing Version 5.01 (2023-09-29)#600636
- R. v. Isaac#824290
Record · ID 1435194
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive