CanLII
metadata only
Abada v. University of Ottawa
Decided: 2026-10-27. Docket: COA-25-CV-1116. Citation: 2026 ONCA 760 (CanLII). Contracts — University relationship — Claim framing — Claims for breach of contract and negligence arising from Ph.D. supervision — Whether the action was, in pith and substance, an academic dispute — Trial judge’s findings based largely on credibility assessments — Comprehensive examination treated as academic in nature — Appeal dismissed | Administrative law — Justiciability — Academic decisions — Gauthier c. Saint-Germain cited on courts not entertaining academic disputes — Whether the trial judge erred in characterising the comprehensive examination issue as academic — University Senate Appeal Committee relief noted — No error found in the characterisation — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Trial management —
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- R v Musick#1368062
- Sui v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1481032
- Logistik Unicorp Holdings Inc. c. Clearspring Capital Partners II#1053809
- Dawoud v. Canada (Attorney General)#1236045
Record · ID 1481029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive