Logistik Unicorp Holdings Inc. c. Clearspring Capital Partners II

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, qcca, 2026qcca1228, 2026 qcca 1228 (canlii), 2026, qcca, 1228, (canlii), 500-09-032025-264, 2026, procedure, appeals, motion to dismiss, code of civil procedure, art. 365 para. 1, application to dismiss an appeal for no reasonable chance of success, appeal described as rearguing the merits and focusing on questions of fact, absence of reviewable error emphasised, application granted, appeal dismissed with legal costs, procedure, appeals, screening applications, code of civil procedure, art. 365 para. 1, whether the appeal has no reasonable chance of success, respondents seek dismissal at the outset, appellant’s grounds characterised as reiterating first instance arguments, no merit found in alleged disregard of the record, appeal dismissed, procedure, appellate review, palpable and overriding error, whether the appellant identified an error meeting the palpable and overriding standard on questions of fact, reliance on hydro, québec v. matta, 2020 scc 37, para. 33, trial reasons described as detailed and carefully reasoned, appellate intervention refused, appeal dismissed, contracts, share purchase agreement, expert determination, whether the bdo report was binding absent manifest error, superior court held the report not tainted by any manifest error, appellant alleged misreading of reports, disregard of definitions, and improper accounting understanding, binding effect maintained, appeal dismissed