CanLII
metadata only
Torr Metals Inc. v Senior Permitting Inspector of Mines
Decided: 2026-10-21. Docket: CA51660. Citation: 2026 BCCA 438 (CanLII). Procedure — Appeals — Limited appeal orders — Whether leave required under Court of Appeal Rules, r. 11 — Supreme Court Civil Rules, r. 22-1(4)(c) governing document applications in petitions — Judicial Review Procedure Act record production argument rejected — Leave required for document production, cross-examination, and privilege-list orders — Leave required | Procedure — Leave to appeal — Interests of justice — Goldman, Sachs & Co. v Sessions criteria — Whether proposed appeal raised matters of importance to the practice — Prima facie merits assessed, including delay to the judicial review petition — Weak merits and no practice significance — Not in the interests of justice to grant leave — Leave to appeal denied |
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R. v. Ali#1166771
- Pawlowski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1204068
- EVR Consulting Ltd v Nathan Osbaldstone [2026] EWHC 1464 (Ch) (15 June 2026)#290693
- 18 U.S.C. § 3289 — Indictments and information dismissed before period of limitations#573415
- R v Gassner#1219763
Record · ID 1501624
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive